J   a   n   u   a   r   y       2   0   0   0

Homepage Links Music Pictures Writings
mIRC Leftovers About me Message Board Guestbook

Monday, January 31, 2000

     I realize that very few of you use IRC and that even fewer care, but I updated my mIRC script today. If you are one of those few that care and would like to download it, here it is. It can only be used with mIRC v5.61. If you don't have it, get it at www.mirc.com. If you have any questions feel free to ask, but if you are a first time user of IRC do not even bother. :-)

Sunday, January 30, 2000

     Nice? Very nice. Someday they'll look back at this one, the ups and downs, the thrills and spills. They'll look back at Super Bowl XXXIV - and nobody will have a clue what they're talking about. Please? Pretty please? While I have everyone's attention, while everyone (a few disappointed Westerners aside) is in a full gridiron giddy, can we finally get rid of those ridiculous Roman numerals? Can we toss those silly X's and V's and I's over the side once and for all?
     Once upon a time, they were only silly and pretentious. Now they're incomprehensible. Incomprehensible and totally annoying. Here's your typical Super Bowl newspaper paragraph: "Smith's 286 yards passing not only eclipsed John Jones's performance in Super Bowl XXVI, but brought back memories of Jack Schitte and Winston Johnson's accomplishments in Super Bowls VIII and XII. Of course, no one will ever forget Super Bowl VI..."
     Wrong. Everyone will forget Super Bowl VI, and most of the others, too, as long as they keep sticking Roman numerals on them. Earth to NFL headquarters: The Roman Empire is dead. The sooner this idiot numerology is dead and buried right alongside it, the better off we'll all be.
     Here's the problem: Roman numerals don't mean anything. Actually, that's the second problem. The first problem is that people first have to figure out which Roman numeral is which - then they don't mean anything. I can keep Super Bowls I through III straight; the little numbers are easy. Super Bowls IV through XIII are easy enough, no more than two letters are involved.
     And after that? I start losing track. On the other hand, I can still tell you about the 1991 World Series, for instance, because I remember where I was and what I was doing in 1991. For that matter, I can tell you about the 1955 World Series (more grief for the West, come to think of it) and I wasn't even born yet. You see, the number 1955 has links to the real world, while and XIX and XXXIV and the rest are nothing but gibberish.
     And breaking the code? Simple. All you have to do is remember that the very first Super Bowl took place in 1967, so Super Bowl XII, for instance, must have happened XI years later, which gets you from 1967 to ... wherever it gets you. Or you can work backwards, and remember that this year is Super Bowl XXXIV, so Super Bowl XII must have happened XXXIV-minus-XII years ago, which is XIX, and XIX from 2000 is...
     Or you can take up golf.
     Maybe they're worried, the NFL honchos, that having the "2000 Super Bowl" finishing up the 1999 season would confuse people. Like the current system doesn't?! Counting in dog years would be better than the current system. But the really bizarre thing is the way the rest of us go along with this nonsense. If the NFL wants to keep dressing up in togas, that's its own business, but why does every reporter and announcer in the country have to buy in? I mean, the Olympics in Atlanta last summer were officially the "Games of the XXVI Olympiad" or something, which was all very nice for the opening ceremonies, and then they marched in and lit the torch and almost everyone went right back to calling them the "1996 Olympics," and comparing them to the "'84 Olympics" and the "'52 Olympics" and... And everyone understood what they were talking about. What an interesting concept!
     Pretty please, National Football League! For the sake of clarity - for the sake of sanity - throw the Romans to the lions. Do it now. Trust me on this one: It's only going to get worse.
     There will be L to pay.

     Oh yeah, I almost forgot. Put me down for $10 on the Rams.

Saturday, January 29, 2000

     Mmmmm, sketti. If you know what I'm talking about and you're there, great! If you know what I'm talking about and aren't, then WHY NOT?! If you don't know, then sorry. I guess you weren't invited. Again, I'm sorry. By the way, there is picture of me on that page about me. Go find it. Also, Jane-Marie's picture has been added to the page where I keep pictures of all those beautiful women. Go find that too. I'm too lazy to type out the links. :-)

Friday, January 28, 2000

     Thanks Ashley! You're always there when I need you, and sometimes when I don't. And in this case, I didn't, but you were just in the right place at the right time ... um, blah ... thanks for the story/joke. :-) As Ashley said, I would love to hear Mrs. Hilliard say this to someone.
     A high-school English teacher reminded her class of the final exam the following day. She told the class that there would be no excuse for not showing up, except for serious injury, illness, or a death in the student's immediate family. A smart-ass jock in the back of the room asked, "What about extreme sexual exhaustion?" The entire class did its best to stifle their laughter.
     When silence was restored, the teacher smiled sympathetically at the student, shook her head, and sweetly said, "No. You can write with your other hand."

     Hahahaha. Hehehehe. Hohohoho. Okay, now that the laughter has ceased, and since you probably got that in your email box anyway (therefore the space above being wasted), I have prepared something else for you...
     WHY THE HELL didn't anyone tell Zach or me about the plans to go to IHOP? We had the original plans on Monday to get there at noon... I told Farinelli, I told Parker, I told Wiesner. I told Scott & Meg, I told others... NO ONE TOLD ME the change to 10:00. No one told Zach. So basically, we're screwed. How could you do this to us? After all we've done and will do for you? No one even cared so much to call me and invite me, let alone remind me to wake up at 9:30. Gah, how rude.

Thursday, January 27, 2000

     Well, last night sucked. Lucky for me, I was nominated for the Golden Eagle Award for Math at my school. With that nomination comes three generic essay questions... two for me, three pages of writing, and it has to be good because students all over Georgia are competing for this award. BLAAAAH. I was up until nearly 4:00am writing those stupid papers. I think I kicked their asses (in other words, I did a good job), but I'm not the judge so only time will tell. The interview I must plan for March 4 makes up much of the grading scale, if you can call it that, and I believe I have what it takes to beat most of the Middle Georgian math nerds in that area.
     Oh yeah, that does have a point. I am going to put one of the papers on my site in the next couple of days. I would do it now, but the final copy is at school. Sucks, eh? I'm sure you can make it a day or two.
     For those of you invited to dine at my mother's Saturday night, directions (and a map) are on Scott's message board. Just click the link at the top of the page to get there. If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask.

Friday, January 26, 2000

     Today's update is just a cosmetic one. I added two pictures on the pictures page, Christi's and Christine's ... odd how their names start so much alike. Anyhow, I also fixed the color problems on many of the pictures, so you should be able to see everyone a little more clearly. If there is anything I have done that you see that I didn't tell you, WOW! You're paying more attention to what I'm doing than I am! Have a good day, and I hope everyone enjoys school Friday, cuz I won't be there!

Tuesday, January 25, 2000

     Do you want to know the truth about your pencils? For thirty seven years, the Houston County Board of Education has been suppressing information from you about your pencils and thus endangering the welfare of sexaholics everywhere. In July 1992, Pee Wee Herman met with Britney Spears in Atlanta to discuss the lack of good help these days. As it happens, they engaged in hot and wild monkey sex and ended up hatching a plan involving the Nudists in central Mexico.
     As a result, all details of the meeting were suppressed, as was information about dealings with Kroger and their ties to masturbation in public. A report in the Wallstreet Journal was mysteriously pulled from newsstands in December of last year. The article implicated high-ranking officials in the FDA, various sluts, and, perhaps not surprisingly, your mother. According to the report, passages in Dr. Seuss's book "The Cat in the Hat" and lyrics in Mariah Carey 's music point to a connection between these individuals and your pencils. According to a spokesman at Wallstreet Journal, the issue was pulled because of printing errors. However, individuals who saw the original copies say that there were no printing irregularities and that the re-issue differed from the original only in the absence of this article.
     The lies and deception must be stopped. Don't let the government hide the facts about your pencils any longer. Learn the truth!

Monday, January 24, 2000

     Every piece of knowledge is a tool, and all tools give you power. Ever since we humans fell in love with our tools and started remaking the surface of this planet in our own image, we have settled into the belief that there is no such thing as too much knowledge. That belief is mistaken. There actually is such a thing as too much power and too many tools, and while any form of censorship is counterproductive and oppressive, we should be doing more as a culture to turn away from our endless intellectual steeplechase.
     For starters, this ugly pile of facts we have accumulated as a species has led us to believe, wrongly, that we are somehow more informed about reality and what we should be doing in it than we really are. We have some idea about what reality is. We have no idea at all about what we should be doing with it, and don't let anyone tell you different!
     The more we know, the messier our perception of our own role in the world becomes, and the less able we are to organize our knowledge into a form that serves us. Instead, we end up serving the knowledge like arrogant residents of some inbred trailerpark looking down their noses at their hillbilly cousins who have to be shown how to flush a toilet. Our bodies have a native intelligence that we should be humble before, and the time is long overdue that we put down the rebellion of mind where it has asserted itself as the king of the body. There is no democracy except that of the organs of the body, but we'll get to that in a few moments.
     Perhaps things are different in other parts of the world, but here in America, there is an almost universal contempt for people who, for example, drink constantly, do not work and live on their parents couch in front of the TV, or stand begging for money on street corners. Here in America, the beggars try to recover some of their dignity by holding signs that say "will work for food", when everybody, including the beggars, know very well that if they actually would work for anything at all, they would not be standing on a street corner holding a cardboard sign asking for donations. The existence of signs like this is a testimony to the predominating ethical position in modern industrial culture that if you don't work, or even if you don't like to work, there is something wrong with you. This is, of course, ridiculous. It is no more ridiculous to lay in bed and drink yourself to death than it is to get out of bed in the mornings and fritter the years away behind a cash register or computer or behind the scalpel in the operating room of a hospital.
     The good news is that since everything you might do once your eyes snap open in the morning is more or less equally ridiculous, there is no reason to either do something or not to do anything. Get up and work on a cure for cancer if it makes you feel any better. Nothing at all wrong with it. Run for office, become an artist, or just help little old ladies across the street. I promise I will keep my bemused, smartass comments to myself.

Sunday, January 23, 2000

     First thing's first: Congratulations to Kyla, better known this weekend as Miss Warner Robins High School 2000! That's so awesome that someoen I feel so close to is recognized with such an awesome award. I don't know much to say, I'm still rather awe-stricken. I don't know that you heard us, but when you're number was first called before your talent we yelled "MARRY ME KYLA" from the depths of our chests. It was rather poorly done, but we expressed our love for you as best we could! You're going to go far in life, and I hope I'm always there in some way or another to see you succeed!
     On a slightly unhappier note, apparently I returned Emily to the safety of the Middleton home about one hour later than I was supposed to, and it seems as though she's been restricted from any kind of social interaction besides school for three days. Well, we go to different schools, so this is going to suck. Bare with me guys and dolls, I don't know what I'm going to do. I only hope I can keep myself together. Good night, and good luck with the dawn of a new week full of ... WORK!

Saturday, January 22, 2000

     Let's start out by getting a few things straight. First of all Scott, I don't spend my time coming up with pointless (well, semi-pointless) modest proposals. I do, however, do my homework, and if I feel any paper I write should be on my page, well then I put it here. Second, I didn't give away the surprise dinner. If any thing about that conversation had given it away, it would have been your reaction letting him know that something was given away. In case you haven't noticed, we go out to eat quite often, it was just a casual remark to which you read too loudly. Anyway, his reactioon when he arrived at O'Charley's last night proved that nothing was given away ... So this arguement is pointless (well, semi-pointless). One last thing: "I don't care" usually means "I don't care," but not when you actually care about the question asked. I can often tell when someone cares about something or not, in which case I will ask if you are sure a few times... It's like Regis asking if it's your final answer. Most of the time he does it to instill doubt in your mind, but if it is the VERY FIRST QUESTION, then obviously you need to rethink your answer, because otherwise he would just say you're right and move on - I mean com'on, the first five questions are so easy that they have to be done that way. What kind of moron would say Little Jack Horner pulled a blackbird out of a pie anyway? Wait, I'm off on a tangent; going back... All I'm saying is that when you really care for something, don't say that you don't.
     If any of the above upsets anyone, email me and tell me why, and I will be sure not to do it again. Also, I have a quick question for you, Brad. How is it that lately we've gotten along so well? Have I just not pissed you off? If so, let me know what I'm doing right so that I may attempt to keep doing it. We have more fun when we aren't threatening to destroy one another. That's all.
     I'm not normally one to plagerize (cough, cough), but this is so histerically funny that I felt it had to be in more than one place. These are Scott's words, not mine (just for the record). ... As Stan on South Park says, "I learned a lot today." I really did. I learned that no matter how bald you are, crack cocaine is always an option. I learned that no matter how many times you think no one cares, someone (an idiot too :-þ ) does. I learned that no matter what is going wrong in your life, something isn't (in my case someone!). I learned that you can ski without snow. I learned that a one hour wait for dinner builds character. I learned Brad is insecure about the size of his "good" (and I mean good, not goods!). I learned someone cares about me. And lastly, I learned someone loves me (*tear* serious one too!!). ... Hah, I especially liked the part about the one hour wait for dinner.
     Now I must tell you the story of Zach's "surprise" birthday dinner last night. It was my job to get there early and reserve a table for 15 while Becky was going over to Zach's to "hang out." I got to O'Charley's at five till six of the clock, and figured we'd be seated by 6:30 or so, when everyone was supposed to arrive. Anyway, Becky's mom called her at 6:30 and told her to come pick up her little brother up from O'Charley's and take him home. "He wasn't feeling well." AWESOME plan. By the time they arrive at about 6:45, a crowd had gathered in the doorway waiting (1) to be seated and (2) on Zach's arrival. Well, he walks in and sees Ashley. "Hi Ashley! What a coincidence!" Then he sees Jane-Marie. "Oh HEY Jane-Marie! You're here too, WOW!" Then nine heads turn around and start exclaiming happy birthday and stuff like that, to which he responds... "AHHH shit! You guys suck!" and he runs out the door laughing his ass off. The rest of the night was equally as exciting, and if you missed it, too bad! Use your imagination.

Friday, January 21, 2000

     Some people like WARNINGS. They feel that WARNINGS are very important things, especially for people who are under the age of 18. If you clicked onto this page, you could very well be one of these people. So, if you want WARNINGS, I'll provide WARNINGS:

WARNING #1 - These pages contain satire.

WARNING #2 - "Satire is wasted on fools and lost on knaves."

WARNING #3 - Should you be offended by any of the satire in these pages, refer back to WARNING #2. Only you can determine if the satire was wasted or lost. (I just don't know you that well.)

WARNING #4 - Reading can be a mind-expanding and addictive activity. Do so at your own risk.

WARNING #5 - The bathroom and the kitchen are the most dangerous rooms in the average home. Reading satire in these rooms could increase your risk for an accident.

WARNING #6 - The Surgeon General warns that "Cigarette Smoke Contains Carbon Monoxide." Satire does not, unless you attempt to smoke it.

WARNING #7 - Reading WARNING statements will increase your blood pressure and the general level of stress on all major body components. (Sorry, I probably should have made this WARNING #1.)

Thursday, January 20, 2000

A Modest Proposal
For Preventing Literature from Being a Burden to Our Country, and Benefiting All

     It is a melancholy object to those who attend this great school or those similar, when they see the desks, the tables, and the lockers cluttered with textbooks of literature, often accompanied by a rather thick notebook, and importuning all with the reminder of wasted hours in that dreaded classroom. This class, rather than filled with the teachings of unique and worthwhile lore, instead is saturated with utterly boring and useless information. This class, when one has finally settled in life, has no effect on the outcome of his important decisions. This class leaves a horrid impression on the poor child; so horrible that he may never properly recover.
     I think it is agreed by all that this infinite number of books in the arms, or on the backs, or in the lockers of their respective student owners (and, in my own humble opinion, the classes too) is in the present a very cruel injustice. Therefore, anyone who could find a fair, cheap, and easy method of correcting this incredible pain would deserve so much as to have an international holiday established in his honor. My intention, however, is very far from being confined to aiding the institution of literature and contributing to its expansion. It is of much greater meaning, and shall take the whole number of classes and textbooks, which are condemned to provide for the very problem to which they are the cause.
     In the hope for wellbeing for all mankind, I make the following proposal. That, instead of the literature classes aiding the failure of many young ones to join society on account that they cannot skillfully master the art of penmanship, the literature texts should constitute a bonfire stack, thus contributing to the eradication of the expansion and instruction of literature. There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will bring the divisions of race together as one for one great moment in the history of man, and the rebirth of human enlightenment, as the destruction of literature, shall be looked on as the pinnacle of human existence.
     The number of books of the literature mold in America is usually reckoned eight hundred million and a half. Of these I calculate there may be about eight hundred million texts whose intention is merely entertainment and therefore are no threat to society. This being granted, there will remain half of a million books; from which I subtract forty-two texts that do not focus on prolonging the meager existence of literature in schools and may actually be of respectable quality. I prospect that there cannot be so many, but let it stand that there are only five hundred thousand minus forty-two books which may remain in circulation.
     I am not so violently bent upon my own opinion as to reject any offer proposed which shall be equally innocent, cheap, easy, and effectual, but no such proposal exists. It has been said by the wisest of men that by strengthening the methods and material of teaching the literature that it may improve one's ability to function in society, when quite the contrary is true. The mind is cluttered with much useless information - quotes, definitions, and the like - that it has no time to process the thoughts that are necessary for survival in the consumer world. Another commendable proposal involved reducing the amount of literary technique and such, teaching only the basics. This can never work, for any foundation with nothing to build on is merely a scapegoat for those who will later wish to rebuild the institution of literature, and will only cause confusion at catastrophic levels.

     I allege, from the depths of my human consciousness, that I have no personal interest in the execution of this scheme; I have no other motive than the common good of my fellow Americans by advancing our general knowledge in all fields and ridding the world of a redundant pest. There are no profits to be made, no awards to be delivered, and I am already free of the grand deception of literature.

Wednesday, January 19, 2000

     "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog." Thirty-six letters of pure genius - oh wait, no, that sentence is so 1980. So what if it uses all 26 letters of the American English alphabet? Is this the kind of literature we deserve? No, my friends. No longer shall we have to see those 36 letters of gibberish in our beginner's computer courses. It is time to make a stand, and tall I stand at that, and I exclaim:

"Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs!"

     I am just the man; I've realized that now. By the way, I now have a girlfriend, and I'm a very happy boy. Her name is Emily. Then again, 95% of you that visit this page know that by now. I shall have a picture of my beauty for all the world to see - that is as soon as she "finds one she likes." :-)
     Earth to the dead, ZACH is SEVENTEEN! *the heavens sing* Happy birthday bubba! You can't rent porn now! You realize that you would be God to a younger sibling if he/she wanted porn or something else only 17-year-olds could get. Think of the possibilities! Hrm...

Tuesday, January 18, 2000

     After a short hiatus, the voice of evil returns. You really, really don't want to know what I've been doing. I don't want to know what I've been doing, and I was doing it. Such, however, is life. Now, where were we? Ah... Pursuing happiness is a tricky business. Is not increasing the sum total of human joy a good act? Well, it is and it isn't. I had to wheel Bentham's stuffed and mounted carcass out sooner or later (don't ask), and it might as well be now. First, a primer on this month's ridiculous moral theory:
     Utility. Let it not be said that I contend that evil has utility. It is sometimes said that there is much to commend in vice, for it frequently brings about a long-term net gain in the happiness of all. This is just another way of saying that the end justifies the means, which is simply incorrect. End and means are morally separate, and each stands or falls on its own merits. The voice contends for evil in means and end.
     This, of course, means that ends are to be selected, among other things, for the harm they do. Frequently, harm done brings harm on the evildoer - we live in a complicated world that includes, among other things, the concept of revenge. This is not, I hear you venturing to suggest, a particularly smart way to behave - no human who thinks itself rational will willingly make life worse for himself. Fair enough, but there is an answer. Before we turn to it, though, what if making life nicer for one's fellow man was just as much a denial of enlightened self-interest? Let us digress and see if this is so.
     We begin with this precept: if there's one thing the bad guys are afraid of, it isn't passive resistance, the strength of non-violence, moral force or the space brethren coming to save the world. It's other, badder guys. From this we may confidently deduce the reason we've had several thousand years of moral philosophy aimed at making us all better people. Face it, if you're going to run a civilization, who do you want for citizens: Jesus' little sunbeams, every one, or six billion Vlad the Impaler wannabes?
     Now, I allege no conspiracy here, just the natural operation of the way human beings behave in the mass. For another point of view, take a scuttle round the net. Grab a search engine and feed it "JFK", "Mind control", "big brother" and any other catchwords of the conspiracy theory mill that you can think of. Everywhere you see the horror of the little guys at the thought that they aren't actually seeing the fruits of their generations of moral rectitude. They've all been good, the Man is still cracking the whip, and they concoct the most remarkable narratives to explain why it's not their own fault but the machinations of the Conspiracy.
     My heart bleeds for them, really it does. Well, not all of them. The racial supremacists of various colors, the gun nuts and the militias may be collectively and individually madder than a warehouseful of mattresses, but at least they've decided to kick back even if their actual practices stand among the most half-assed attempts at revolution yet seen by human eyes - most of them haven't two brain cells to rub together.
     What they do is illustrate a point; in the absence of a uniformly good world, good does not pay off in short or long term - but only in the mind. Even if you don't buy that, you can at least accept that if after thousands of years of striving to improve the character of mankind we are in no better moral or material shape than our savage ancestors, we can confidently say that goodness does not pay concretely.
     Oh, bother. I've lost my train of thought. I think what I was trying to say is ... Choose your ends according to your moral lights, and learn to live with or avoid the consequences. The rationality of conventional morality demands absolute safety in an inherently unsafe world, and those who aspire to be accomplished should have nothing to do with it. In short, live a little. Take a chance.

Monday, January 17, 2000

     Below is a story from one of those annoying chain email type things that everyone hates to get. Well, the story was worth repeating, and instead of mass-mailing everyone I know, those of you that love me enough to visit my page can read it. Thanks Meg!!! :-)

     Jack took a long look at his speedometer before slowing down from 73 mph in a 55 mph zone. Fourth time in as many months. How could a guy get caught so often? When his car had slowed to 10 miles an hour, Jack pulled over, but only partially. Let the cop worry about the potential traffic hazard. Maybe some other car will tweak his backside with a mirror.
     The cop was stepping out of his car, the big pad in hand. Bob? Bob from church? Jack sunk farther into his trench coat. This was worse than the coming ticket. A Christian cop catching a guy from his own church. A guy who happened to be a little eager to get home after a long day at the office. A guy he was about to play golf with tomorrow. Jumping out of the car, he approached a man he saw every Sunday, a man he'd never seen in uniform.
     "Hi, Bob. Fancy meeting you like this."
     "Hello, Jack." No smile.
     "Guess you caught me red-handed in a rush to see my wife and kids."
     "Yeah, I guess."
     Bob seemed uncertain. Good. "I've seen some long days at the office lately. I'm afraid I bent the rules a bit - just this once." Jack toed at a pebble on the pavement. "Diane said something about roast beef and potatoes tonight. Know what I mean?"
     "I know what you mean. I also know that you have a reputation in our precinct."
     Ouch. This was not going in the right direction. Time to change tactics. "What'd you clock me at?"
     "Seventy-one. Would you sit back in your car, please?"
     "Now wait a minute here, Bob. I checked as soon as I saw you. I was barely nudging 65." The lie seemed to come easier with every ticket.
     "Please, Jack, in the car."
     Flustered, Jack hunched himself through the still open door. Slamming it shut, he stared at the dashboard. He was in no rush to open the window. The minutes ticked by. Bob scribbled away on the pad. Why hadn't he asked for a driver's license? Whatever the reason, it would be a month of Sundays before Jack ever sat near this cop again.
     A tap on the door jerked his head to the left. There was Bob, a folded paper in hand. Jack rolled down the window a mere two inches, just enough room for Bob to pass him the slip. "Thanks." Jack could not quite keep the sneer out of his voice. Bob returned to his car without a word.
     Jack watched his retreat in the mirror. Jack unfolded the sheet of paper. How much was this one going to cost? Wait a minute. What was this? Some kind of joke? Certainly not a ticket. Jack began to read:

     Dear Jack, Once upon a time I had a daughter. She was six when killed by a car. You guessed it - a speeding driver. A fine and three months in jail, and the man was free. Free to hug his daughters. All three of them. I only had one, and I'm going to have to wait until heaven before I can ever hug her again. A thousand times I've tried to forgive that man. A thousand times I thought I had. Maybe I did, but I need to do it again. Even now. Pray for me. And be careful. My son is all I have left.
                        Bob

     Jack turned around in time to see Bob's car pull away and head down the road. Jack watched until it disappeared. A full 15 minutes later, he, too, pulled away and drove slowly home, praying for forgiveness and hugging a surprised wife and kids when he arrived.
     Life is precious. Handle with care. Drive safely and carefully. Cars are not the only thing recalled by their maker.

Sunday, January 16, 2000

A Modest Proposal - Pringles vs. Playstation

     An intelligent young man sits in front of the TV, clutching a PlayStation controller and screaming in horror as his alter ego crashes to his death off a pixellated cliff. He bitterly shakes his head and mumbles, 'just one more go'.
     He doesn't want another go. He knows he should be doing creative and positive things, but instead he feels about nine years old, and part of him wants his Mum to come in and tell him to get up those stairs and tidy his room.
     Hitting the Start button again is a crucial 90's experience. It's the pivotal point between enjoyment that comes from wanting to continue and enjoyment that comes from not wanting to stop. From here on, the buzz he gets is from the knowledge that he's wasting his time and spoiling himself. You tell yourself you'll play till you get another hi-score but you know that even if you stop then you'll still get annoyed with yourself for not stopping earlier.
     This 'once you pop, you can't stop' attitude applies equally well to another 90's phenomenon, Pringles potato snacks. Like computer games, Pringles are fine when diluted by company, but if it's just you and the tube, you're in trouble.
     The first third of them are genuinely lovely, and you can try and decide which way round you prefer to eat them. Eat them like an 'n' and they fit round your tongue in a satisfying way - harmony and balance; eat them like a 'u' for that feeling of crushing them against the roof of your mouth - domination and conflict. Half-way through the tube, you really don't want any more but you imagine the licentiousness of letting yourself just finish them all anyway. Doing something so obviously unnecessary affirms, in a ridiculously tiny way, that you don't always do sensible - you can also do reckless and spontaneous.
     MTV works in the same way. You've enjoyed a few videos, and now it's time to watch some real television, but you're still there four songs later, saying 'let's just see if the next video's any good'.
     It might seem pathetic that much of our enjoyment from these wonderful new things comes from getting to the stage where we hate ourselves. Either we should enjoy them till we've had enough and then stop, or do something really spectacular if we want gluttonous overindulgence. Finishing a tube of Pringles isn't exactly a Bacchanalian orgy.
     People have always enjoyed being bad, and the 'just one more' syndrome has been around as long as chocolate, but the real lesson to be learned from Pringles and PlayStations is that the overindulgence they demand from us is impersonal, fleeting and mass-produced.
     These epiphanies of consumerism are just shadows of real excess. Like rollercoasters, they offer cheap thrills in complete safety. We risk nothing in eating a few too many potato snacks, or playing an extra game of FIFA football, and yet we feel like we're bold transgressors. To be really rebellious, you have to eat Pringles only until you've had enough. Once you pop, you can stop.

Friday, January 14, 2000

     Like many philosophically interesting notions, existence is at once familiar and rather elusive. Although we have no more trouble with using the verb exists than with the two-times tables, there is more than a little difficulty in saying just what existence is. Existing seems to be at least as mundane as walking or being hungry. We know what it is like to be hungry or to walk, but what is it like to exist, what kind of experience is that? Is it perhaps the experience of being oneself, of being identical with oneself? Yet again, we can readily indicate what is meant by walk, but surely existence is not something we can indicate to anyone. On the face of it, there would seem to be no way at all in which we can explain what existing is.

Wednesday, January 12, 2000

     It's been a while since I last updated this page. First and foremost I would like to wish Amy Griswold a wonderful 17th birthday tomorrow; for one day she shall be my sunshine. Or something. Anyway, I leave you now with a random assortment of thoughts.

     The visual world, the world as we see it, is a world populated by colored objects. Typically, we see the world as having a rich tapestry of colors or colored forms - fields, mountains, oceans, hairstyles, clothing, fruit, plants, animals, buildings, and so on. Colors are important in both identifying objects and in re-identifying them. So much of our perception of physical things involves our identifying objects by their appearance, and colors are typically essential to an object's appearance, that any account of visual perception must contain some account of colors. Since visual perception is one of the most important species of perception and hence of our acquisition of knowledge of the physical world, and of our environment, including our own bodies, a theory of color is doubly important.
     Despite much thought, over thousands of years, by philosophers and scientists, we seem little closer now to an agreed account of color than we ever were. The disagreement is reflected in the fact that some theorists believe colors to be perceiver-relative; that dispositions or powers to induce experiences of a certain kind, or to appear in certain ways to observers of a certain kind. Others take them to be objective, physical properties of objects. Among the latter group, some take these properties to be physical microstructures, while others regard colors as irreducible properties of physical bodies, and yet others take them to be dispositional properties to affect light. Finally, there are even some who deny that there are colors in the world at all: there are none of the colors, it is claimed, that we naturally and normally and unreflectingly attribute to objects.
     The major problem with color has to do with fitting what we seem to know about colors into what science, particularly physics, seems to require of physical objects and their qualities. It is this problem that historically has led the major physicists who have thought about color, to hold a common view: that the colors we ordinarily and naturally take objects to possess, are such that physical objects do not actually have them. Oceans and skies are not blue in the way that we naively think, nor are apples red, (nor green). Colors of that kind, it is believed, have no place in the physical account of the world that has developed from the 16th Century to this century.
     Such a view is clearly paradoxical, given what was said above, about the ubiquity of colors in the perceived world, and about the importance of colors in the identification and re-identification of physical objects. Physicists were aware of the paradoxical nature of their views. While some clearly welcomed this consequence, others thought it possible to mitigate the paradoxical character of the doctrine by drawing a distinction between two concepts of color: (i) color as a sensory quality, intrinsic to our sensory experiences; (ii) color as a power, to induce sensory experiences with color, understood as a sensory quality. On this account, color terms have a systematic ambiguity. Provided we take account of the ambiguity, no harm is done, and much benefit derived. According to this view, then, in one sense of color, physical objects have colors, for they have the power to induce experiences of color, but in the other sense, they do not. The paradox of this position might be resolved by claiming that, when we enjoy visual experiences, then in some sense we project the sensory quality in our experience on to physical objects.

Friday, January 7, 2000

     Last night I found a hilarious spoof on the Matrix in which the dream world (the Matrix itself) that the characters of the movie were "hacking" in to was not the false reality of 1999, but IRC (Internet Relay Chat). If you don't use IRC, this will only be mildy humorous for you. If you do use IRC, you will see a lot more punchlines! I recommend visiting cr0bar's bastardization of the Matrix - NOW.

Thursday, January 6, 2000

     Happy birthday Megan Middleton! Today she celebrates the fifteenth anniversary of her arrival on this lovely planet. Megan's birthday is too important to be drowned out by other nonsense babbling on my part, so have a great Friday everyone!

Tuesday, January 4, 2000

     Today I shall continue with part two of my review of sorts of The Matrix. Be sure to read part one (yesterday, January 3) before reading part two.

     Neo enters the living room of a small, over crowded, run down apartment. The room is filled with young children. An Asian boy sits quietly reading a text in a foreign language. Two girls sit in front of a television, seeming to make play blocks hover and move in the air above their hands. A young boy dressed in the robes of a Buddhist monk sits quietly on the floor with a collection of radically bent and twisted spoons arrayed on the floor in front of him. Another spoon is in his hand, twisting and writhing in the air as he looks at it.

     "Do not try to bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth: there is no spoon. Then you will realize that it is not the spoon that bends, only yourself."

     The landscape of The Matrix is absolutely littered with references begged, borrowed and stolen from across the Western consciousness. Neo is awoken from this false reality by Morpheus, appropriately named after the Greek god of dreams. Morpheus borrows heavily from the imagery of Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass." Visually the film borrows heavily from pop culture and other films and genres - be on the lookout for the subtle nod to Star Wars and the classic western standoff between Neo and Agent Smith in a run down subway station with blowing newspapers substituting nicely for tumbleweeds.
     But what is most surprising is the sheer number and range of Biblical references made, references I would imagine were entirely intentional. Morpheus fills the role of John the Baptist to Neo's Jesus. Neo undergoes a literal death and resurrection. There is an obvious Judas figure. Morpheus' ship is named after King Nebuchednezzar. The last surviving human city, the entire hope for the future, is named Zion. The references fly fast and thick and it's hardly surprising that elements of the church have been hailing the film as a Christian allegory. A closer look, however, suggests that if the imagery is Christian it comes from a heavily gnosticized view of Christianity.
     The spiritual core of the film comes in the sequence when Neo visits the Oracle - a seer who prophesied the coming of someone who would be able to remake the Matrix as he saw fit and would rescue humanity - in her dank apartment. The Oracle tells Neo that he needs to "know himself" and the key conversation with the spoon bending boy in her living room (Neo is heard repeating "There is no spoon" at one key point later in the film) both suggest that the solution to the human condition lie in specific pieces of knowledge. This stands in direct opposition to the Christian contention that the human problem is one of nature and being, but fits perfectly well with a gnostic understanding of things. The ancient gnostics believed that the world we lived in was an inherently evil place, created by a malicious god and that humanity was trapped in this reality. The key to a spiritual freedom from this physical world was believed to be in gnosis - Greek for hidden knowledge. The world of The Matrix fits this view of the world nearly perfectly: the machines fill the role of God - creators of a hostile, imprisoning world; freedom comes through knowledge hidden from all but the elect few - in this case, Morpheus, Trinity, Neo, the Oracle etc.; the gnostic disdain for the physical world carries through in the resistance fighters willingness to kill indiscriminately within the Matrix.
     A "Christian" film? No, probably not, but The Matrix does show a willingness to explore and integrate religious themes in a way that very few film makers will do in the mainstream, and The Matrix deserves full marks just for raising the questions. Beyond that, it's just a great ride.

Monday, January 3, 2000

     An authentic eastern martial arts dojo. Panes of paper make up the walls, exposed wooden beams - likely teak - raise the peaked ceiling, slats - either wooden or bamboo - comprise the floor, a pair of combatants face one another from opposing sides of the floor.

     "This is a construct."

     The duo explodes into action, moving so quickly the eye finds it nearly impossible to follow the flow. The movements are precise, acrobatic, even artistic, as fists and feet fly and the duo flip and spin in and out of combat. One leaps, hanging impossibly high in the air before crashing down and driving his knee through the floor where, moments before, his opponent had lain. The other runs up a vertical beam, taking several steps up the span before flipping off and landing on the far side of the room.
     "Do you think that my being faster or stronger has anything to do with my muscles in this place? You think that's air you're breathing now?"
     This is the world of The Matrix: a world from which reality has been stolen from the human race and replaced by a complicated virtual world who's purpose is to keep humanity enthralled and enslaved; under the power of a race of intelligent machines harvesting the electrochemical and heat energy from their human slaves to feed themselves. The Matrix tells the story of a computer hacker, Neo, who is freed from this false reality and expected by his liberators to in turn free the rest of the human race from their slavery. The scene described above is taken from an early part of Neo's training regimen, in which Morpheus, the leader of the resistance, is teaching Neo to "bend" the rules of the virtual world to make himself more powerful within it.
     As might be expected with a premise such as this, the effects are absolutely stunning. To film the kung fu sequences and insure a genuine feel, the film's four principal actors (Neo, Morpheus, Trinity, and machine Agent Smith) gathered on site a full three months prior to filming for martial arts training. Well-placed computer generated effects mesh with incredible physical effects to create a world both completely believable and totally immersive. As an action film, The Matrix is simply first rate. As science fiction, it is very likely the most convincing and best realized vision of the cyberpunk dystopia to ever reach the screen within the mainstream of the American film industry. But, appropriately enough, there is a fair bit more to The Matrix than what simply meets the eye.

Sunday, January 2, 2000

     I told myself and you that I was taking the weekend off and that I would not give you anything new to read until Monday. This was before I read Brad's dissertation for the ladies from December 29th. What a pointless waste of time writing (on his part) and reading (on mine). No offense to him. 99% of what I've read by him is great, spine-chilling, just entertaining stuff. But this ... this wasn't.
     He speaks about guys and sex as if he's been in bed with many, many men. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I honestly don't think he has had any sexual encounters with any men. If that be the case, then his only knowledge of what he speaks of is stereotype, second hand conversation, and opinion - mostly opinion. Now I'm not one to question or speak in contempt of his opinion, but I know how many people read his page on a daily basis, and I felt it necessary to respond in some way. Back to my argument... Brad claims that any compliment of the penis is bliss for any guy. I understand how this can be true for a large portion of males, but certainly not all. There are those who would first think ... "Hmm, slut." ... and just walk on. Others may actually be frightened by the sheer fragility of the conversation and run in terror. The latter portion of males would be the extreme minority, but they do exist, and you girls should definitely not be so open towards any guy's 'member' unless you have intentions on meeting him/it.
     As for Brad's "if you're me" finale, I have nothing to say, except that it's obvious enough that he's full of shit that there's really no need to respond. I hope I haven't offended or upset anyone. This was merely an opportunity for me to peacefully disagree. I also must warn the masses... School returns in 2½ days! AHHHH!

Saturday, January 1, 2000

     Happy New Year! *looks around* Nope, no Y2k bug around here. Looks like it's a big Y2k DUD. But wait, the business world won't boot up their computers again until Monday morning, meaning the millenium bug is just lurking ... waiting to strike at a more inopportune time. Gotta love that! I'm taking the weekend off everyone. This is all you'll hear from me on here until at least Monday. Have a fun weekend!

Old Stuff

November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999

This page has been loaded   times.

© 1999-2000 j.p.mccord, iii.